The main standard beta coefficient (? = –0

The main standard beta coefficient (? = –0

The Engagement Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Engagement subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .08). 245) for the rationalist epistemology, t(1096) = – 8.42, p < .001, was in the opposite direction compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.119) for the constructivist epistemology, t(1096) = 4.08, p < .001, along the Engagement subscale.

The Attentional Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Attentional subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .18). The significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.396) for the rationalist epistemology t(1096) = , p < .001, was in the positive direction; whereas the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.129) for the constructivist epistemology t(1096) = –4.12, p < .001, which was in the negative direction along the Attentional subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology has more of a leaning towards a narrow focus on the Attentional subscale, and the constructivist epistemology leans more towards a broad focus on the Attentional subscale.

The Operative Subscale Lastly, epistemology was a significant predictor of the therapy style along the Operative subscale, F(2, 1093) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .256). The standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.461) for the rationalist epistemology was significant, t(1093) = , p < .0001 and in the positive direction, compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.170), for the constructivist epistemology, t(1093) = –6.50, p < .0001, which was in the negative direction along the Operative subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology tends towards more planning on the Operative subscale and the constructivist epistemology tends towards more spontaneity on the Operative subscale.

That it offered the new hypothesis that rationalist epistemology seems on the an effective reduced degree of wedding on Involvement subscale therefore the constructivist epistemology appears on a greater standard of involvement towards the Involvement subscale

For this reason, epistemology (rationalist vs. constructivist) was discovered to be a serious predictor out of medication build. Particularly, one particular robust findings offer provisional help toward understanding you to there are particular differences in the non-public style of the fresh new counselor according to therapists’ epistemic assumptions. Even more particularly, the present day investigation discovered that therapists having rationalist epistemologies tended toward much more length, a lower level of wedding, an excellent narrower interest, and you may an increased amount of believe within their instruction that have members, while, the newest constructivist epistemology tended towards the having an increased level of intimacy, an increased degree of engagement, a wider attract, and a lot more sense of humor inside http://www.datingranking.net/fr/evaluez-ma-date/ their cures instruction. As well, discover particular service into notion you to definitely practitioners that have constructivist epistemologies are likely into the the brand new guidelines away from autonomy rather than tightness from inside the the medication design; however it was maybe not an especially good looking for in the present analysis.

These types of results are helpful with regards to the fresh new potentially inherent distinctions maintained of the rationalist versus constructivist epistemologies centered on therapy concept. Far more especially, latest conclusions secure the sense one to cognitive-behavioral treatments, which represent an educated portrayal of the rationalist epistemology, manage a keen “active-directive” and you may systematic approach to medication (Granvold, 1988) with certain specifications familiar with package the course of the course (Mahoney Lyddon, 1988).

Theory dos-Epistemology Influences new Therapeutic Relationship

With respect to the second theory-therapists with rationalist epistemologies will rating high to the Task and you can Goal subscales minimizing into the Bond subscale compared to the constructivist epistemologies-some other multiple linear regression model is actually presented to choose in case your same predictor varying (therapist epistemology) do dictate therapists’ ratings of one’s standards variables (functioning alliance) centered on therapists’ millions of around three subscales-Task, Mission, and Thread.

Leave a comment

อีเมลของคุณจะไม่แสดงให้คนอื่นเห็น ช่องข้อมูลจำเป็นถูกทำเครื่องหมาย *